In one of my own private projects (codename "Tag Bonsai"), a little chrome extension for working with tags, I ran into some performance issues. I figured this was down to recursive creation of DOM tags, so I ran a little test. (Find the full code at the bottom of this posting!)
The results were astounding.
They were not astounding, though, regarding their general direction. Of course iteration is faster than recursion, and of course native JS objects are faster than their jQuery sires.
What was astounding was the sheer
factor of performance penalties involved. On my puter, those are the results when creating 10000 spans:
recursive on jq objects: 11567.999999999302
recursive on js objects: 348.99999998742715
recursive on acc'ed html: 82.00000002398156
iterative on jq objects (without penalty): 10442.000000010012
iterative on js objects (without penalty)201.9999999902211
iterative on acc'ed html (without penalty): 41.99999998672865
iterative on jq objects (with penalty): 9248.00000002142
iterative on js objects (with penalty): 425.99999997764826
iterative on acc'ed html (with penalty): 61.000000016065314
That's a factor of ~ 190 when writing html manually in an iterative loop, compared to recursively creating jQery objects, even if I penalize the iterative by doing a push and pull each time (because under production circumstances, I'd have to manage a stack of objects by hand).
Here are the results again, ordered by time:
iterative on acc'ed html (without penalty): 41.99999998672865
iterative on acc'ed html (with penalty): 61.000000016065314
recursive on acc'ed html: 82.00000002398156
iterative on js objects (without penalty): 201.9999999902211
recursive on js objects: 348.99999998742715
iterative on js objects (with penalty): 425.99999997764826
iterative on jq objects (with penalty): 9248.00000002142
iterative on jq objects (without penalty): 10442.000000010012
recursive on jq objects: 11567.999999999302
Okay, JS objects are obviously a bit slower than pure html text (by a factor of 3 or so), and recursion drops the speed by another 3rd or so; but jQuery is an awful lot slower than that!
According to this simple test, jQuery objects involve a forbidding impact on performance, especially when combined with recursion. (It's interesting that iteration w/ jQuery and recursion w/ JS objects are relatively close together.) So if you have to create lots of DOM objects, and if you know which browser you use, definitely use the native JavaScript methods!
(I'm not quite sure why some penalized versions seem to be faster than their non-penalized counterparts - there might be some bug in my code, or it's just some random imponderability in my machine; but I think the general direction is still correct and as revealing as a skimpy white dress under heavy rain. It's just staggering.)
var limit = 10000;
function createSpanRecJqObj(i, el) {
var div = $('<span>' + i + '</span>').appendTo(el);
if (i < limit) {
createSpanRecJqObj(++i, div);
}
}
function createSpanRecHtml(i) {
var html = '<span>' + i + '</span>';
if (i < limit) {
html += createSpanRecHtml(++i);
}
return html;
}
function createSpanRecJsObj(i, el) {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.appendChild(document.createTextNode(i));
el.appendChild(span);
if (i < limit) {
createSpanRecJsObj(++i, span);
}
}
function createSpanIterJqObj(i, el, penalty) {
var stack = [];
if (arguments.length === 2) penalty = false;
var i;
for (i = 0; i < limit; ++i) {
if (penalty) stack.push(i);
el = $('<span>' + i + '</span>').appendTo(el);
if (penalty) stack.pop();
}
}
function createSpanIterHtml(i, penalty) {
if (arguments.length === 1) penalty = false;
var html = '';
var stack = [];
for (var i = 0; i < limit; ++i) {
if (penalty) stack.push(i);
html += '<span>' + i;
}
for (var i = 0; i < limit; ++i) {
if (penalty) stack.pop();
html += '</span>';
}
return html;
}
function createSpanIterJsObj(i, el, penalty) {
var stack = [];
if (arguments.length === 2) penalty = false;
console.log('penalty', penalty);
var i;
for (i = 0; i < limit; ++i) {
if (penalty) stack.push(i);
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.appendChild(document.createTextNode(i));
el.appendChild(span);
el = span;
if (penalty) stack.pop();
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
var sw = new StopWatch();
sw.start();
createSpanRecJqObj(0, $('body'));
var timeRecJqObj = sw.stop();
$('#time').append('recursive on jq objects: ' + timeRecJqObj + '<br/>');
sw.start();
createSpanRecJsObj(0, document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]);
var timeRecJsObj = sw.stop();
$('#time').append('recursive on js objects: ' + timeRecJsObj + '<br/>');
sw.start();
$('body').append($(createSpanRecHtml(0)));
var timeRecHtml = sw.stop();
$('#time').append('recursive on acc\'ed html: ' + timeRecHtml + '<br/>');
sw.start();
createSpanIterJqObj(0, $('body'));
timeIterJqObj = sw.stop();
$('#time').append('iterative on jq objects (without penalty): ' + timeIterJqObj + '<br/>');
sw.start();
createSpanIterJsObj(0, document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]);
timeIterJsObj = sw.stop();
$('#time').append('iterative on js objects (without penalty)' + timeIterJsObj + '<br/>');
sw.start();
$('body').append($(createSpanIterHtml(0)));
timeIterHtml = sw.stop();
$('#time').append('iterative on acc\'ed html (without penalty): ' + timeIterHtml + '<br/>');
sw.start();
createSpanIterJqObj(0, $('body'), true);
timeIterJqObj = sw.stop();
$('#time').append('iterative on jq objects (with penalty): ' + timeIterJqObj + '<br/>');
sw.start();
createSpanIterJsObj(0, document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0], true);
timeIterJsObj = sw.stop();
$('#time').append('iterative on js objects (with penalty)' + timeIterJsObj + '<br/>');
sw.start();
$('body').append($(createSpanIterHtml(0, true)));
timeIterHtml = sw.stop();
$('#time').append('iterative on acc\'ed html (with penalty): ' + timeIterHtml + '<br/>');
});
